1982 computer movieRating: 13/20
Plot: This prequel to The Big Lebowski has The Dude, here a video gamer rather than a bowler, slurped into a computer, given a skin-tight glowing outfit and a Frisbee, and forced to battle a guy in a different colored skin-tight suit. Oh, snap!
I have mixed feelings about this one. Tron's got a unique look, but it kind of looks a little dorky. I think it even looked dorky back in '82, but in a way, it really doesn't seem dated. The computer world has to look minimalistic and cartoony, and ultimately, I always like how this movie looks. The action scenes (the motorcycle scene, that giant thing Jeff Bridges reassembles telepathically [?] and drives around, the climactic Frisbee toss) increase in lameness with each passing year, and the story is really confusing, especially for a Disney movie. Like all Disney science fiction movies, I wish this had a little more of an edge. It's vanilla sci-fi which is too bad since this could have had some interesting things to say then that would have still had relevancy today. Instead, it doesn't say much of anything. It's thematically lost. Is it a religious allegory? A fable? A warning? A muddled metaphor? Something else? The music is about perfect for the imagery. That's Wendy Carlos, formerly Walter Carlos, who did music for A Clockwork Orange and The Shining. Which reminds me of a question I have about this movie: Why would the programs in this have genders? Don't get me wrong. I'm glad Cindy Morgan is in this movie, probably just because I was tired of seeing only men in the skin-tight outfits. But wouldn't these programs lack genitalia? And would Jeff Bridges lose his genitals once he enters the virtual world? Or would he, since he's a programmer instead of a program, have conspicuous genitalia and become some sort of god in the computer world? It's something to think about. See, if somebody other than Disney made this movie, I'm sure genitals would have played a more prominent role.
Here's a guy who likes Tron a little more than I do:
Yeah the major problems with Tron are even more glaring, now almost thirty years later.
ReplyDelete1-Its dated. Badly BADLY dated. From someone running a video game room, to the special effects. It has not aged well. Plenty of movies have much older special effects, and still look great today. You just reviewed Superman, for instance, or going back even farther, War of the Worlds from the 1950's.
2-As you so rightly point out, what the hell is this movie about??? There is the real world story of David Warner stealing Jeff Bridges ideas...and Bridges trying to get them back. And then there is the Tron storyline of trying to break through some bad programs. The whole film was essentially Bridges decides to hack into a computer...and then sends out messages that he wrote the game programs. It was a ten second idea, put into this digital world.
There is a sequel coming. I bet it will be louder, with incredible effects and lots of explosions. It also has Jeff Bridges AND Bruce Boxleitner reprising their roles. Guess what else it also has? Thats right, Jeff Bridges has a kid that has to go save The Dude in the Tron world. I hate sequels like that.....and I bet I am going to hate the Tron sequel...assuming I ever see it.
Oh..and I give Tron a 15...I like it slightly better than you, but not that much.
Speaking of genitalia, I am now going to gouge out my eyes thanks to the pictures of that pathetic creature you posted. Homer "ughhhhhh".
ReplyDeleteA 15 for me, as well. They tried to do something cool, and I was never bored.
i gave it a 12. i thought the special effects were perfect for the time period. the story is confusing and the acting rather bland.
ReplyDelete