Thor

2011 religious movie

Rating: 8/20

Plot: Odin's titular kid is too cocky and stirs up too much trouble, so he's sent from Asgard to earth where he falls in love with Natalie Portman and saves humanity from some bad guy from Asgard who is up to evil things that I never quite understand because I'm too bored to pay attention.

If I'm going to eventually watch The Avengers, apparently the greatest movie ever made, I have to do my homework and watch these other movies. I've got Hulk and Iron Man covered, so it's just this and Captain America. I'm not exactly a comic book or superhero expert, but when the most interesting character in the whole movie is "Pet Store Clerk" played by some guy named Isaac Kappy, you probably have a sucky superhero movie. Isaac Kappy's had a great start to a very promising career, by the way. No, he doesn't have his picture on imdb.com yet, but he does have three message board posts on his page and only one of them is his. He just hasn't had the right role yet because his work as "Pet Store Clerk" in this is fantastic. He's played Rowdy Prisoner, Stoner Dude, Geek, Buzter Pie (in Klown Kamp Massacre), and Hustler, but I'm willing to bet his best work is still to come. But back to Thor since this is his movie, unfortunately for him. This is the least fun I've had watching a superhero movie with the exception of Spiderman 3, but Spiderman 3 did at least have a great scene where James Franco is enjoying pie. It's all so stiff and lifeless and the scenes on Asgard taste a lot like the inside of a computer. So many grand swooping fake camera movements over shiny castles. Look at the scene where, accompanied by giant omnipresent predictable music, Thor and his peeps ride horses on a iridescent bridge after these big fake doors open. It just made me wish that I was watching a Western with real people riding real horses. Then, they go to a yellow-eyed guy who watches over the bridge. He turns out to be important, and if more people read this blog, some comic book nerd (Kent?) would tell me what his name was and make fun of me for not knowing it. I could stop all that from happening by just looking it up, but my eyes still hurt a little bit from all the Asgard glossiness. I really hated the action scenes in this. It didn't take long for me to be convinced that this whole movie was just part of a conspiracy to sell plastic hammers to children. But the action scenes confused me, especially the one where they loudly fight in the land of the ice people. There's a lot of swooshing and a lot of crumbling things, but it was mostly too dark for me to figure out exactly what was happening. Or maybe it was my television. I'm too lazy to Google "Guy with yellow eyes on the shiny gay bridge in Thor," so it's not hard to believe that I'd be too lazy to adjust the brightness on my television. Things improve slightly once Thor hits earth, and this part of the movie really could have worked as an entry in the whole stranger-in-a-strange-land genre if ("What realm is this?") it just didn't take itself so seriously. I did chortle when Thor smashed a glass in a diner. I might have enjoyed that part of the movie more, but I was confused about how a taser could take a superhero out, probably because I didn't watch this with a comic book nerd (Kent?) who would have explained it all to me. And what's with all the tilted camera angles in this? Was it the cinematographer's ingenious way of showing that Thor's world had become askew? Was it an homage to the comics? The dialogue in this is very awkward, and that might explain why the acting is almost universally bad (Pet Shop Clerks excepted), especially Natalie Portman who is quickly becoming a sort of pet peeve for me. She needs to stop before she loses all credibility. And speaking of credibility, why is Kenneth Branagh directing stuff like this? Did he run out of Shakespeare plays? Did somebody convince him that this was a Shakespeare play? Another question--isn't the whole Thor-as-a-Christ-figure thing a bit odd? Or is the whole father/son story (that's how Netflix categorized this for me, by the way) an archetype? Anyway, back to the movie. Eventually, Thor magically--and by that, I mean stupidly--gets his hammer back and fights a giant metal man in a tornado. And that's not even the big dumb climactic fight scene that all of these superhero movies seem to end with. No, that pits the sort-of good against the ambiguously evil in a special effects laden bunch of hurls and clashes that succeeded in making me wish I had gone to bed instead of watching this. And it was four in the afternoon!

This is fairly verbose, so let me simplify things for you: Watch this with a comic book nerd (Kent?), give your comic book nerd instructions to wake you up in time to see the scene in the pet store, fall asleep before the movie starts, watch Isaac Kappy's genius, and leave to buy an ice cream cone. You can thank me later.

3 comments:

  1. I liked this one a bit more than you, but it was the dullest of the Avengers pre movies made. I thought the guy that played Thor was fantastic, absolutely perfect for the part. The early scenes with the Frost Giants were okay too, as we get to see Thor actually use his powers to full effect. Unfortunately too much of this movie is made up of a powerless Thor walking around New Mexico. I have been to New Mexico.....they used it as the first atomic test site for a reason...nobody would miss it if its gone. The story was not very compelling, and even though I liked the casting of Loki, he never comes together (In this movie) as a believable villain or more of a threat than an annoying insect.


    The other major issue I had was how terrible Natalie Portman looked. Washed out, pale, and lifeless....kind of like the entire movie. While my sort of wife got to drool all over the theater of the muscle bound, often shirtless Thor, I was stuck with the weakest cheesecake in history.


    By the way, the watcher guy of the Asgard Gods, is named Heimdall. He is not usually portrayed as African either.

    A 13 or 14 for me.....leaning towards a 13 and a half.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Enjoyable review (really liked "scenes on Asgard taste a lot like the inside of a computer"), but I guess I have a higher tolerance for superhero fluff (not to be confused with "fluffing" superheoes. I liked the dynamics of the father-son-brother relationships, and the battles were different enough to work for me. The 15 I give is for an action film that wasn't great, but kept me entertained.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 8/20 seems a little harsh now, but I was just so bored. Maybe if I had been familiar with the source material, this would have connected more with me.

    Is it just me or is Thor kind of a dumb idea for a superhero? He's a god! Wouldn't that be like making a comic book with Jesus as a superhero. Actually, that's probably already been done, hasn't it?

    If I had more readers, I bet one of them would answer, "Yeah, they already did...it's called the Gospels."

    ReplyDelete