The World According to Garp


1982 Garp movie

Rating: 12/20

Plot: Garp.

All of the posters seem to have Robin Williams making that goofy Robin Williams face while appearing to play a rigorous game of pocket pool. The one I liked the best had a much smaller Robin Williams looking up at a gigantic naked baby. That baby starts and [spoiler alert] ends this thing, and it's really hard to criticize a movie that has a penis in its framing device.

George Roy Hill made some of my favorite movies in his not-all-that-prolific career. Slap Shot, The Sting, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid are all great enough that it should have inspired me to watch this much earlier. Nevertheless, this was one I'd never seen, and when I put together a list of favorite 1982 movies, a couple people pointed it out as a possible omission.

It was not.

Part of the problem might be that I just don't understand it. I understand the narrative, as sprawling and haphazard as it seems to be. Character motivations, especially characters giving into indulgences that we don't even know they have, don't always make sense, but the story's fine and probably even intriguing. What I don't understand is what it all adds up to. With militant self-mutilating feminist groups, a mother proudly recalling how she raped a guy, unnecessary fathers and male heroes, and castration, it seems that there are obvious feminist themes, but it's strange to consider what those might be. A male authored the source material, that same author co-wrote the screenplay with another guy, a male directed the movie, and a male plays the title role, and that further muddies the feminist waters. There are all sorts of weird connections to make. Garp temporarily loses something that connects him to the wacko feminazis, a word I'm using just to get some hits from the Fox News crowd. Lithgow's transsexual former tight end, a surprisingly non-exploitative performance for a movie made in the early 80's, has to add something as his character seems to be the one with the least flaws. Swoosie Kurtz, who I just saw in A Shock to the System, plays this hooker who keeps popping up unexpectedly. Wrestling has to be some sort of symbol for something--structured masculinity or something. There's references to flying, mostly because that's the only thing that Garp knows about his father. The same joke about the reproductive inabilities of basketball players is heard at least three different times, only once with the punchline. Parallel scenes with undertow or undertoads. It seems like these pieces are things we're supposed to put together, but the edges don't quite fit. It's frustrating.

The performances from Glenn Close as Mom, Lithgow as that former football player, and Mary Beth Hart as Garp's love interest are all pretty good, the former two even being nominated for Oscars. I didn't like Williams nearly as much, probably because he plays all of his dramatic characters the exact same. There's this everyman likability he brings to his dramatic characters, but the quirks he gives them, the way he shows various emotions, and the facial expressions he makes are all roughly the same. Granted, these are all things that only Robin Williams could do, but this movie really shows his limitations as a dramatic actor, at least in this stage in his career, and he's a little distracting.

I've never read the book, but from what I can tell, this is a faithful rendition of Irving's novel. So I have no choice but to blame the source material for why this just doesn't quite work.

2 comments:

  1. For me this one is about a third of a really entertaining movie. Then the car wreck scene happens, and it simply becomes miserable. Filled with dreary, unhappy scenes and gross miserable characters. Williams is WOEFULLY miscast, because his best assets, his humor and manic cocaine fueled charm, are out of place in this unhappy world. I had the first of two laser discs of this movie, way back in the day. (I dont remember why, I think it was some friend at a video store that gave it to me)...I watched that first part of the film, with a lot of Lithgow and chasing dogs, and going after speeding neighbors, and it was pretty good. I didnt ever see the second part until years later...and boy was that disappointing. Bitten off penis's, chopped out tongues, and multiple gunfire murders. John Irving was a very unhappy person, and he wanted you to know it. Your 12 is about right.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, I'm just not sure it ever establishes the right tone. Williams isn't really manic at all here, but he bugs me in these dramatic roles because he plays them all the same. Whether you liked the guy or not, you have to admit that he brings a wholly original voice to the comedic stuff. There just wasn't anything else quite like that. But as a dramatic actor, he was extremely limited with almost no range at all.

    It is quite the downer of a movie. The first half has a pace and breeziness that reminds me of something like Forrest Gump or something. And although Gump takes some dramatic (traumatic) nosedives, it has a consistent fluffiness that makes it easy on the soul. This one is more like lying down on a pillow that is half feathers and half nails or something. The last half is such a drag.

    Note: I hope nobody takes this as a praise of Forrest Gump.

    ReplyDelete