Monsters University


2013 prequel

Rating: 15/20 (Jen: 18/20; Emma: 17/20; Abbey: 17/20; Buster: 19/20)

Plot: Awkward and definitely non-scary Mike, since a field trip to Monsters, Inc. as a little fellow, has always dreamed of being a scarer. Sully's the son of a former all-star scarer. They meet in college and with the former working as hard as he can to make up for a lack of natural talent while the latter gets by solely on his, they don't initially get along. In fact, their disagreement escalates to the point where an accident gets them thrown out of the scaring program. They have to join a fraternity of oddballs in order to enter a scaring contest and get back in the program. Then, the whole movie sort of borrows the plot of Revenge of the Nerds II: Nerds in Paradise only without Curtis Armstrong.

Look at all those potential toys on the movie poster up there! At least they're almost all new faces. With the exception of the two main monsters and Randall, Pixar fought the urge to force a bunch of characters from the first movie into this thing. A lot of them make appearances, but they're on the periphery or maybe the periphery of the periphery. Waternoose, for example, is only seen briefly in a picture, and the details changed about him were funny. Roz and Ratzenberger's Abominable Snowman might be a little forced, but they not in the thing long enough to be any more than a gag. I went into this experience with low expectations. I wasn't thrilled about a sequel (well, prequel) to Monsters, Inc. anyway, and after the abysmal Cars 2 and the mediocre Brave, I just didn't have high hopes for this one even though the possibilities in this Monsters world really do seem endless, a well that I'm sure the Disney people wouldn't mind dipping into again and again with a television series or a bunch of sequels. This isn't upper-echelon Pixar exactly, but it looks like they're heading in the right direction. For me, a prequel should really deepen your understanding of the characters, allow the characters that you already feel like you know and love to develop and grow. This story does that with Sully and Mike very well, and it makes the friendship we see in the first movie something a little more special. Randall's developed as well, albeit more generically, and Buscemi does a great job taking a little edge off the voice since his character is way less confident and malicious and a lot, well, dorkier. Goodman and Crystal are good, too, and so is Helen Mirren as a new character--the sort-of villainous Dead Hardscrabble. Love how that character moves, and the sound effect added to her walking. The animation is a lot better than what we saw in the first movie, especially with the backgrounds and setting details. The first movie pretty much takes place in one setting, and it looks plastic at times and after a while is a little redundant. The ancient buildings and the foliage on the Monsters University campus allow for a lot more texture variety. There's almost nothing spectacular about the setting details in that first movie. Here, the backgrounds are really lovely, the Pixar people building on the photo-realistic details we're getting in CGI cartoons these days. The story itself won't blow away anybody who has seen any number of underdog stories on film, but there was a nifty unexpected twist at the end and the morals of the story--stuff about friendship and teamwork--are great and, like the best Pixar stuff, filled with heart. The new characters are mostly welcome additions, and some of them are really funny. The movie's a lot of fun, at least when you're watching it for a first time, and there are a couple scenes that are even exciting without being as goofy (or as long) as that door sequence from the first movie. A dramatic scene near the end of the movie is very well done. Oh, and there's one shot of Mike and Sully sitting beside a lake under a full moon that people will want made into a poster. Beautiful.

Here's my updated list of my favorite Pixar movies, something that I could more than likely change depending on my mood:

1) Toy Story (bonus for being the first/sentimental reasons)
2) Up
3) Finding Nemo
4) Ratatouille
5) Toy Story 3
6) The Incredibles
7) Wall-E
8) A Bug's Life 
9) Monsters, Inc.
10) Monsters University
11) Cars
12) Toy Story 2
13) Brave
14) Cars 2

I'm not really confident in that ranking. 1-6 could all shuffle a bit. 7-12 could shuffle. I'm really unsure where to put Wall-E. I'm confident that 13 and 14 are in the right place though. Regardless, it's still a remarkable resume from the Pixar people.

Oh, the short, a cutesy love story about umbrellas. It wasn't bad. I watched most of it thinking that it was really lazy. "This is just live action with some animated faces on the umbrellas," I thought. I'm still having trouble believing that it was all animated. They're just showing off. The story for this one was the sort of thing you'd see in a silent comedy, only with inanimate objects.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

your top 10 is pretty close to mine.
finding nemo
toy story
monsters inc
bugs life
up
toy story 3

somehow you've added nonpixar movies. whats this cars you speak of? toy story 2? no for some reason they skipped right to 3.
brave was okay. the main characters hair was beautifully animated(there if you cant say something nice...)

Shane said...

The more I think about 'Cars,' the more I think that it's a better movie than people give it credit for. Mater is a huge misstep, but that story's got a lot of heart. And Paul Newman.

I don't know why you're leaving off 'Ratatouille' or 'The Incredibles' in your top 10 that is really only 6.

cory said...

I suppose I'll end up watching this when it comes out on dvd, but the original was one of my least favorite Pixar efforts, and this feels like cutesy character overdose from the ads.

1. Toy Story
2. The Incredibles
3. Finding Nemo
4. Toy Story 3
5. A Bug's Life
second tier movies...
6. Ratatouille
7. Toy Story 2
8. WALL-E
9. Cars
third tier movies...
10. Monsters, Inc.
11. Brave
12. Up (but includes a brilliant first 15 minutes)
13. Cars 2

Shane said...

Do these ever shift around for you? I find it really hard to rank some of these. I should have just stuck with tiers.

Surprised to see 'A Bug's Life' so high...it's probably too low on my list now that I put a little more thought into it. Maybe around 'Wall-E' instead of after the Monsters movies and that second Toy Story.

If I three-tiered mine, we'd have 1-5 which I think around top tier (Toy Story 1 and 3, Nemo, Up, Rat) and 6-11 would be in the middle tier (both Monsters, Incredibles, Wall-E [I guess?], Toys 2)...but that middle tier would be a tier that a lot of companies would be thrilled to have as their top tier! Cars and Brave are in the bottom. Cars 2 doesn't get to be in a tier at all.

cory said...

I was being charitable to "Too Much Mater". It is the only Pixar film that I would give a thumbs down to. For some reason it is really easy for me to rank Pixar movies and their order has stayed pretty consistent. Maybe because they leave such an impression. After adjusting "A Bug's Life" (a very underrated movie that people seem to have forgotten), just switch "The Incredibles" with "Up" and ours lists would be very similar. Sadly, I think Pixar's golden days are over.

Shane said...

I have adjusted my list! Moved a couple.

I agree that they've only got one "thumbs down" movie so far. And you could be right about their golden days being over, but I think they've got some greatness ahead. I don't know anything about next year's dinosaur (I think) movie, but I can't get 'Land Before Time 16' out of my head. 'Finding Dory'? The other two non-sequels they have on the horizon both have potential.

rio blanco racing said...

i didnt like ratatoullie. it doesnt look pixar. i know it has been softened and frenchized. thats a thing.
i saw the incredibles in the theatre nd havent seen it since. have to do that eventually. i forgot Wall-E that had a lot of heart that is equal with bugs life.